In CUSTOMS Appeal No. 204 of 2011, Awin Exim Company vs Commissioner (Appeal) Customs, Ahmedabad, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has reduced the penalty on account of ‘no monetary benefits’ to Appellant and has held that when penalty is imposed on partnership firm, penalty cannot be imposed on partnership firm.
The rules of the Indian Bar Council prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. GM BOSU & Associates does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ENTER', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
EnterCancel
