Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant And Accused Not A Ground To Quash Criminal Case

18
05/2019

Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant And Accused Not A Ground To Quash Criminal Case

In CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 675 OF 2019, Md. Allauddin Khan vs The State of Bihar, two accused were summoned by the Magistrate in a complaint alleging offence under Sections 323, 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against them on the ground that since there was a dispute pending between the parties in the Civil Court in relation to a shop as being landlord and tenant, it is essentially a civil dispute between the parties.

On appeal, the Supreme Court held that while the High Court had referred to the judgment in State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Ors. (AIR 1992 SC 604), the court had failed to apply the principle laid down therein to the facts of this case. The High Court failed to see that mere pendency of a civil suit is not an answer to the question as to whether a case under Sections 323, 379 read with Section 34 IPC is made out against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 or not.

Full News Link:-

The rules of the Indian Bar Council prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. GM BOSU & Associates does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ENTER', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
EnterCancel