In CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.817 OF 2018, IN CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 309 OF 2016, IN S.L.P (C) NO. 4470 OF 2014, BADRI VISHAL PANDEY AND ORS.vs RAJESH MITTAL AND ORS., the investigating officer himself had deposed that all the confessions by the accused persons were made after the accused were grilled and interrogated multiple times. The bench said that the interrogation in this case does not appear to be of ‘normal character’ and confessions that led to the recovery of the incriminating material were not voluntary, but caused by inducement, pressure or coercion.
The Supreme Court has observed that there is no evidentiary value to an involuntary confessional statement made under undue pressure and compulsion from the investigating officer, even when it leads to the recovery of material objects in relation to a crime.
The rules of the Indian Bar Council prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. GM BOSU & Associates does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ENTER', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
EnterCancel
