In SAPNA ARORA vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB, the Supreme Court said when trial court proceedings are stayed, there is no need for the parties to be in court till the stay is vacated or modified by the court which granted the stay.
This observation was made by the bench while it was told by a lawyer appearing in a transfer case, that despite the stay granted by it, the trial court in Punjab is insisting for the presence of the parties. The court said that We fail to understand the logic behind such a practice, if the submission of the learned counsel is correct. We make it clear that since the proceedings are stayed, there is no need for the parties to be in Court till the stay is vacated or modified by the Court, which granted the stay.
The rules of the Indian Bar Council prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. GM BOSU & Associates does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on 'ENTER', the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are.
EnterCancel
